“No person can be a child of God without living in secret prayer; and no community of Christians can be in a lively condition without unity in prayer. In Daniel’s time you see how it was. (Dan. ii. 17, 18.) You see what Jesus said to his disciples on it (Mat. xviii. 19), and what a sweet promise of his presence and a gracious answer he connects with meeting for prayer. You see how it will be in the latter day (Zech. vii. 21), when meetings for prayer, or, at least, concerts for prayer, shall be held by different towns. One great rule in holding them is, that they be really meetings of disciples. If four or five of you, that know the Lord, would meet together regularly, you will find that far more profitable than a meeting open to all. In an open meeting you are apt to become teachers, and to be proud. In a secret meeting you feel all on a level, poor and needy, seeking water. If a young man, acquainted with any of you, becomes concerned about his soul, or a lively Christian is visiting any of you, these may be admitted; but do not make your meeting more open. (more…)
Archive for the ‘Christian Conduct’ Category
M’Cheyne’s advice for prayer meetings
Posted in Christian Conduct, Practice of Piety, Prayer, Vital Godliness on July 13, 2020| Leave a Comment »
A critical review of Byrd’s ‘recovery’
Posted in Christian Conduct, Contemporary Issues, Social Issues on June 27, 2020| Leave a Comment »
A large blue paperback volume with yellowing pages sits on one of my shelves. With all the stylistic aplomb of the decade of Lisa Frank, a golden starburst adorns the cover stating, “1993 Christianity Today Book of the Year.” The book, Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, has served as a sort of complementarian enchiridion for the decades since. Now it would seem, at least for one author, that this oft-admired tome has outlived its usefulness. Aimee Byrd, a member of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, has published Recovering From Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, a work positioned as a response to this movement spawned back in those heady days when ‘serious’ bible scholars used the NASB. With an adroit repurposing of the previous work’s title and the sort of thematic book cover that publishers dream of, this volume has quickly risen to the #1 bestseller position in Amazon’s Gender & Sexuality in Religious Studies category. Perhaps more importantly to the reader of this review, Byrd’s work is a matter of conversation throughout both the broader evangelical world and particularly the confessional Reformed circles from which she hails.
There is no reason to bore with such a full recounting of the work as other reviewers have and no doubt will admirably supply. Suffice to say that Mrs. Byrd sees the complementarian movement (and specifically the incarnation of it associated with the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood) as having foisted a load of oppressive baggage upon Christian women, the “yellow wallpaper” which she uses as a compelling image throughout the work. In her own bold summary statement, “This book presents an alternative to all the resources marketed on biblical womanhood and biblical manhood today, focusing on the reciprocity of the male and female voices in Scripture, the covenantal aspect to Bible reading and interpretation, and bearing the fruit of that in our church life.” In both title and declared vision, this volume is expressly committed to leaving the complementarian movement behind for something better.
To read further, click here. Special thanks to Rev. Bryan Peters of the Presbyterian Reformed Church of Columbus, Indiana for this guest post.
“The Influence of Christianity in Aiding and Augmenting the Mercantile Virtues”
Posted in Christian Conduct, Commerce & Christianity, Sacred & Secular, Thomas Chalmers on November 10, 2014| Leave a Comment »
The latest addition to the Chalmers audio library:
Rom. 14:18 – “The Influence of Christianity in Aiding and Augmenting the Mercantile Virtues”
And who will harm you if you do what is good?
Posted in Authored by Site Admin, Christian Conduct, Two Kingdoms Theology on September 17, 2014| 4 Comments »
I am a conservative Christian. I also homeschool. I head to the range every month or so. Not only that, but I’m a Calvinist, a psalm-singer, and to boot, someone who believes that the state has an obligation to embrace and support Christianity. So really, I’m not your mainstream, happy-clappy evangelical. For most, I would be just to the right of Attila the Hun. I’m in a subculture of a subculture of a subculture.
And yet, I am increasingly concerned about how reactionary and polarizing folks like me can be. We often tend to be overly suspicious of anyone in government, education, or any institution that we feel encroaches on our freedoms. We can indulge in conspiratorialism, thinking that every government official or educator or doctor has made a self-conscious Faustian bargain with the Devil and is actively plotting our destruction. And then we respond accordingly.
I am concerned about all of this for two reasons. First, ethically, we have a responsibility to “honor all men” and make the Gospel we represent as winsome as possible. Our “light should so shine before men” that they might see our “good works and glorify our Father which is in heaven.” Yes, we must at times offend, but only if it is for “righteousness’ sake.” Yes, we must stand our ground when sacred truth is at stake. But we must do it only when necessary and in a manner that involves no personal offense. Otherwise, we should, “as far as it lies within us, be at peace with all men.”
Second, I have very practical concerns as well. The more we are hyper-suspicious, unreasonable, and just downright cantankerous, the more we court the overreaction of those in positions of power. Tit for tat. “Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him.” If we are proud and stubborn as Christians, how much more will the graceless respond in kind? If we want to preserve our freedoms, we should act worthy of them and not bait the enemy. “For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently?” You’re just reaping what you’ve sown, says Peter.
I think we need to re-tune our theology and ethics here, in order to re-tune our practice. The following points I think are worth bearing in mind.
First, total depravity has been checked – sometimes very significantly – by common grace. To be sure, “there is none righteous, no not one.” And “the carnal mind is enmity against God, and is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.” But unconverted people can be restrained, sometimes greatly. There is a real sense in which we can speak about ‘good pagans.’ I know some really good pagans! They are decent people. Some of them are more decent than some Christians I know. Consequently, there are some decent liberal Democrats, some decent members of the National Education Association, some decent doctors, lawyers, psychiatrists and social workers. Many of them mean well and want to do good, at least on a human level. We ought to realize this and keep it in mind.
Second, the law of love dictates that we assume the best of people, including non-Christians. Love “beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.” Our ethical responsibility is not suspended the moment we leave the church. Our unconverted neighbors – including government officials, educators, and doctors – are innocent until proven guilty. Would we want them to treat us with suspicion upon no clear, justifiable grounds? Even so, let us do unto them as we would have them do unto us. And all the while, let us not forget simple courtesy. “Be ye courteous.”
Third, two wrongs do not make a right. If someone does us wrong – if they give us a hard time for our homeschooling curriculum or our decisions on immunizations – then let us be very careful not to “repay evil with evil.” Rather, our Master tells us, “Bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them that despitefully use you and persecute you.” We can all be tempted to get bitter and retaliate when we are mistreated. But it is not the will of our good and gracious Father, and it will usually only make matters worse.
Fourth, in God’s world, personal liberty must be counter-balanced with social responsibility. We owe it to our society (and yes, to our government!), to educate our children to the best of our abilities. They have a vested interest, as do we, in their academic success. If we turn out illiterates, this is not good for the economy or the tax revenues. It is just plain bad policy to say, let folks do what they will with their children. Now, mind you, I’m hardly advocating statism here. I really don’t want local school officials showing up on my doorstep to scour our textbooks and school records. Yet if they make reasonable requests – or even requirements – let us make sure that they are in fact unreasonable before we just tell them to take a hike.
And my doctor and the rest of society has a vested interest in my health. If I only eat fatty foods and exercise once every two decades, this is bad for me and for others. And if a whole demographic is just like me, then it bodes ill for all. If my mental health deteriorates and I become a risk to myself or others, yes, others have a vested interest in helping me before the unthinkable comes to pass.
Don’t misunderstand. I’m not promoting a lemming-like acceptance of conventional wisdom or the judgments of the establishment. There’s a healthy place for critique. Nor am I suggesting we roll over and play dead when someone oversteps their bounds. I’m all for insisting on personal rights, especially when it concerns the well being of my family. We can and may involve others to help protect those rights. But we must at once learn how to be actually in the world and yet not of it, as well as to be “angry and sin not.”
Let’s be careful to avoid the bunker mentality. Let’s remember that we represent God and Christ before a perishing world of lost and blinded sinners. Let’s remember that we were just like them, whistling down the broad path on the way to destruction. And let’s make very sure that if we cross them, we do it for the Lord’s sake and not for our own agendas. And then we can live with quiet conscience in peace or persecution. “And who is he that will harm you, if ye be followers of that which is good? But and if ye suffer for righteousness’ sake, happy are ye: and be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; but sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ.”
-
Join 124 other subscribers
- Follow West Port Experiment on WordPress.com
Categories
- Alexander Henderson
- Antigua Kirk
- Audio Resources
- Authored by Site Admin
- Benevolence & the Diaconate
- Biblical Interpretation
- Calling of, Mission to the Jews
- Care for the Youth
- Catechesis
- Catholicity
- Chalmers Audio Library
- Charles Bridges
- Christ & the Church
- Christ Jesus
- Christian Conduct
- Christian Life & Experience
- Church of England
- Church of Scotland
- Church Order & Discipline
- Commerce & Christianity
- Communion of the Saints
- Confessional Subscription
- Connectionalism & Conciliarism
- Constantine
- Contemporary Issues
- Contemporary Parochialism
- Covenant Theology
- Culture
- David Nasmith
- Diets of Catechizing
- Divine Providence
- Earthy Eschatology
- Ecclesiology
- Education
- Eschatology
- Español
- Establishments
- Evangelistic Catechesis
- Experimental Religion & the Cure of Souls
- Faith & Saving Faith
- Family Religion
- Fasting & Days of Fasting
- Fatherhood
- Finance & the Maintenance of Ministry
- Free Church of Scotland
- Free Offer of the Gospel
- Gathered Church Ecclesiology
- Gospel Proclamation
- Gospel Tactics
- Gregarious (Social) Principle
- Historiography
- Holy Scripture
- Housekeeping
- Individual & individualism
- James Begg
- John Calvin
- John Knox
- John Murray
- Law & Gospel
- Lectures
- Light of Eternity
- Locality & the Law of Residence
- Medieval Church
- Mental Health
- Ministerial Fidelity
- Missiology
- Moral Suasion
- Mysticism & Fanaticism
- Natural Theology
- New England Puritanism
- Old Testament Theology
- Ordinary Means Ministry
- Parish in American Context
- Parish in Perspective (Qualifications)
- Parish Theory & Practice
- Parochial Strategy
- Pastoral Theology
- Patristics
- Patronage
- Pietism
- Practice of Piety
- Prayer
- Preaching
- Protestant Conversions from Rome
- Protestantism & Romanism
- Psalmody
- Psalmody in Culture
- Public Health
- Puritans & Puritanism
- Redemption Accomplished
- Redemption Applied
- Reformed Parish Mission (RPM) Posts
- Richard Baxter
- RP Study Group
- Sabbatarianism & the Church Calendar
- Sacraments
- Sacred & Secular
- Samuel Rutherford
- Secularization
- Social Byproduct
- Social Issues
- Spiritual Warfare; the Occult
- The Church in America
- The Free Offer of the Gospel
- The Godly Prince
- The Gospel
- The Gospel & the Poor
- The Kingdom of God
- The Lord's Supper
- The Manse
- The Romance of Locality
- The Sacred Ministry
- The Social Status of the Church
- The Visible Church
- Theological Diagrams
- Theology of Community
- Theology of Place
- Theology Proper
- Thomas Boston
- Thomas Chalmers
- Thomas Guthrie
- Transgenerational Faith
- Two Kingdoms Theology
- Uncategorized
- Vignettes from 19th Century District Visitation
- Vignettes from the Old Parish Way
- Visitation Evangelism
- Visitation Journaling
- Visiting the Sick & Dying
- Vital Godliness
- Vox Patrum
- West Port experiment
- Worship, True & False
- WPE Audio
- WPE Memes
Archives
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- November 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- October 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008